Trojan.Nitrogen.A
Threat Scorecard
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecard
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards are assessment reports for different malware threats which have been collected and analyzed by our research team. EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards evaluate and rank threats using several metrics including real-world and potential risk factors, trends, frequency, prevalence, and persistence. EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards are updated regularly based on our research data and metrics and are useful for a wide range of computer users, from end users seeking solutions to remove malware from their systems to security experts analyzing threats.
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards display a variety of useful information, including:
Popularity Rank: The ranking of a particular threat in EnigmaSoft’s Threat Database.
Severity Level: The determined severity level of an object, represented numerically, based on our risk modeling process and research, as explained in our Threat Assessment Criteria.
Infected Computers: The number of confirmed and suspected cases of a particular threat detected on infected computers as reported by SpyHunter.
See also Threat Assessment Criteria.
| Popularity Rank: | 20,623 |
| Threat Level: | 80 % (High) |
| Infected Computers: | 3 |
| First Seen: | August 7, 2023 |
| Last Seen: | April 19, 2026 |
| OS(es) Affected: | Windows |
Table of Contents
Analysis Report
General information
| Family Name: | Trojan.Nitrogen.A |
|---|---|
| Signature status: | No Signature |
Known Samples
Known Samples
This section lists other file samples believed to be associated with this family.|
MD5:
542295866d084d2bad16df24bb968c4c
SHA1:
59ee4adb223079e9b5f65b77711f278763d07f92
SHA256:
48B82AB7B701612F393ABA8502C1CB7DE61F6F29E55975C1A07AB7EB592399FC
File Size:
5.65 MB, 5654528 bytes
|
|
MD5:
3c50b2804949ebedb2996ebb1af469c5
SHA1:
43b509bbf1803d1a29d173992cffe5efb2e79e17
SHA256:
B5AE58F21093E7238A4BCFAB376ECF69D61833C7EFFD533D04D3C1575C3F0E17
File Size:
3.74 MB, 3743231 bytes
|
|
MD5:
e4ae9a27318633981e62cdff17f950ac
SHA1:
6ee5b0d34521a6359c0926dcede7d65323367796
SHA256:
D8303E85731A919DF43A03180D8F0A58B57424670F4C1344C5F55065895945E4
File Size:
4.89 MB, 4885504 bytes
|
Windows Portable Executable Attributes
- File doesn't have "Rich" header
- File doesn't have debug information
- File doesn't have security information
- File has exports table
- File has TLS information
- File is 64-bit executable
- File is console application (IMAGE_SUBSYSTEM_WINDOWS_CUI)
- File is either console or GUI application
- File is Native application (NOT .NET application)
- File is not packed
Show More
- IMAGE_FILE_DLL is not set inside PE header (Executable)
- IMAGE_FILE_EXECUTABLE_IMAGE is set inside PE header (Executable Image)
File Traits
- big overlay
- dll
- HighEntropy
- x64
Block Information
Block Information
During analysis, EnigmaSoft breaks file samples into logical blocks for classification and comparison with other samples. Blocks can be used to generate malware detection rules and to group file samples into families based on shared source code, functionality and other distinguishing attributes and characteristics. This section lists a summary of this block data, as well as its classification by EnigmaSoft. A visual representation of the block data is also displayed, where available.| Total Blocks: | 5,629 |
|---|---|
| Potentially Malicious Blocks: | 322 |
| Whitelisted Blocks: | 3,707 |
| Unknown Blocks: | 1,600 |
Visual Map
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
x
x
0
0
0
0
x
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
x
0
?
0
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
x
?
0
0
0
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
x
?
x
0
x
?
0
0
?
x
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
0
x
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
x
0
0
x
?
x
x
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
x
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
x
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
x
x
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
x
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
0
0
?
0
x
?
?
0
0
0
0
?
0
0
0
0
?
0
x
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
x
?
?
0
?
0
0
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
0
0
?
0
?
0
x
?
?
0
?
x
x
0
?
?
x
0
0
?
0
x
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
0
0
?
?
x
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
0
0
x
?
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
x
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
0
0
0
x
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
x
?
0
?
0
?
0
x
0
?
?
0
0
?
0
0
0
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
0
0
0
?
0
0
?
?
?
0
x
?
0
0
x
0
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
x
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
x
?
?
0
?
?
0
x
?
x
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
0
x
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
x
?
0
x
?
0
x
?
0
?
0
0
0
x
0
?
0
x
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
x
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
0
0
?
0
?
?
?
0
x
0
0
x
0
0
0
?
?
?
0
x
x
x
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
x
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
0
0
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
0
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
0
0
?
?
?
0
0
?
0
0
?
x
0
?
0
0
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
x
0
?
x
0
?
?
0
x
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
x
0
x
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
0
?
0
x
0
x
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
0
x
0
?
?
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
x
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
0
0
?
0
x
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
x
?
0
0
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
x
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
x
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
x
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
0
?
0
x
0
0
0
0
?
?
0
0
?
0
x
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
x
?
?
0
x
x
?
?
0
?
?
x
0
?
?
?
?
x
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
x
?
0
?
x
x
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
x
x
?
0
?
0
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
?
0
?
0
x
?
?
0
0
0
0
?
0
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
x
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
x
x
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
0
0
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
x
?
0
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
0
?
x
?
?
x
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
x
?
0
0
?
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
x
?
?
0
?
0
x
?
?
0
x
x
0
0
0
?
0
?
0
0
?
?
0
x
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
0
0
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
x
?
0
?
?
?
x
0
0
?
0
0
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
x
?
x
?
0
x
x
0
?
0
?
0
0
x
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
x
?
?
0
x
?
x
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
x
?
x
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
x
?
?
0
x
?
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
x
0
0
x
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
x
?
?
?
0
0
0
?
0
0
0
0
0
?
0
x
?
0
x
?
x
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
?
0
0
?
0
x
x
0
0
0
0
0
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
x
?
0
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
0
0
0
x
x
0
x
0
0
x
?
0
0
0
x
x
?
0
x
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
x
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
x
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
0
?
0
0
0
?
x
x
x
0
0
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
x
x
?
?
0
?
?
0
x
?
0
0
x
?
0
x
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
0
x
?
0
?
0
?
x
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
x
?
0
?
0
x
?
0
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
x
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
0
x
?
0
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
0
0
?
0
x
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
x
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
0
x
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
0
?
0
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
x
?
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
x
?
0
x
0
0
0
0
0
?
0
x
?
?
0
x
?
?
?
0
x
0
0
?
?
0
x
?
?
0
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
x
x
0
?
?
0
0
0
?
0
x
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
0
0
?
0
0
x
?
?
?
0
0
0
?
0
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
x
?
0
0
0
?
0
0
?
?
0
x
x
0
0
?
0
0
0
?
0
0
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
0
0
?
x
?
0
?
?
0
0
0
0
x
x
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
0
?
0
0
?
x
?
0
?
?
0
0
0
?
0
x
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
0
0
?
0
0
x
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
x
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
0
x
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
0
0
0
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
0
?
?
0
x
?
0
0
0
?
?
x
?
?
0
0
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
x
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
x
0
?
0
x
?
x
?
?
0
?
0
x
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
x
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
?
?
0
0
x
0
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
?
...
Data truncated
0 - Probable Safe Block
? - Unknown Block
x - Potentially Malicious Block
? - Unknown Block
x - Potentially Malicious Block
Similar Families
Similar Families
This section lists other families that share similarities with this family, based on EnigmaSoft’s analysis. Many malware families are created from the same malware toolkits and use the same packing and encryption techniques but uniquely extend functionality. Similar families may also share source code, attributes, icons, subcomponents, compromised and/or invalid digital signatures, and network characteristics. Researchers leverage these similarities to rapidly and effectively triage file samples and extend malware detection rules.- ClipBanker.FI
- Coinminer.BBGC
- Nitrogen.A
- REntS.E
- Sonbokli.N
Show More
- Trojan.Agent.Gen.ATK
- Trojan.Agent.Gen.ATM
- Trojan.Agent.Gen.GR
- Trojan.Kryptik.Gen.BBW
- Trojan.Kryptik.Gen.CAX
- Trojan.Kryptik.Gen.CHK
- Trojan.Kryptik.Gen.CXN
Windows API Usage
Windows API Usage
This section lists Windows API calls that are used by the samples in this family. Windows API usage analysis is a valuable tool that can help identify malicious activity, such as keylogging, security privilege escalation, data encryption, data exfiltration, interference with antivirus software, and network request manipulation.| Category | API |
|---|---|
| Syscall Use |
Show More
|
