Trojan.Vidar.Y
Threat Scorecard
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecard
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards are assessment reports for different malware threats which have been collected and analyzed by our research team. EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards evaluate and rank threats using several metrics including real-world and potential risk factors, trends, frequency, prevalence, and persistence. EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards are updated regularly based on our research data and metrics and are useful for a wide range of computer users, from end users seeking solutions to remove malware from their systems to security experts analyzing threats.
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards display a variety of useful information, including:
Popularity Rank: The ranking of a particular threat in EnigmaSoft’s Threat Database.
Severity Level: The determined severity level of an object, represented numerically, based on our risk modeling process and research, as explained in our Threat Assessment Criteria.
Infected Computers: The number of confirmed and suspected cases of a particular threat detected on infected computers as reported by SpyHunter.
See also Threat Assessment Criteria.
| Popularity Rank: | 9,489 |
| Threat Level: | 80 % (High) |
| Infected Computers: | 12 |
| First Seen: | June 16, 2026 |
| Last Seen: | September 6, 2026 |
| OS(es) Affected: | Windows |
Table of Contents
Analysis Report
General information
| Family Name: | Trojan.Vidar.Y |
|---|---|
| Signature status: | No Signature |
Known Samples
Known Samples
This section lists other file samples believed to be associated with this family.|
MD5:
57c3b22d774ee25676eaebdc823c958a
SHA1:
27c74a9642cd31492724aa2b54e46c8fd2f150ad
SHA256:
BD8BD1C10456AB8242AB7479265359B93DCC2621DAE350383B4C797D87F812DF
File Size:
307.71 KB, 307712 bytes
|
|
MD5:
18e3efa65a3fc0beb6dc8d581ca3ec92
SHA1:
778ea584b6bf4d3b6bfa441ce1c7e39707fa08ae
SHA256:
4D8E9DE5AF802646628956F031AC85AE0E37A7AB8D0569C0EFA4EC5FB2EE3228
File Size:
329.73 KB, 329728 bytes
|
|
MD5:
15e52dcb2ef47ddf9082b8de0e2cc276
SHA1:
5e7a8e94365b6bac4868bf2a0afacf317edcf556
SHA256:
67ADAA0F221BB70658E78EBC598FC9FC3C55D782C84B1C5D78BB905D044490D7
File Size:
352.26 KB, 352256 bytes
|
|
MD5:
f4ddc619243cb19282ec49bb7e23b284
SHA1:
dfc43ece41445c594709b0309e488b58f9f6e8e2
SHA256:
B1BA539646051446C0582689B9B87956EC7354D999CD2218AACD8389AD9C0BFD
File Size:
1.39 MB, 1390592 bytes
|
Windows Portable Executable Attributes
- File doesn't have "Rich" header
- File doesn't have debug information
- File doesn't have exports table
- File doesn't have relocations information
- File doesn't have resources
- File doesn't have security information
- File has been packed
- File is 64-bit executable
- File is either console or GUI application
- File is GUI application (IMAGE_SUBSYSTEM_WINDOWS_GUI)
Show More
- File is Native application (NOT .NET application)
- File is not packed
- IMAGE_FILE_DLL is not set inside PE header (Executable)
- IMAGE_FILE_EXECUTABLE_IMAGE is set inside PE header (Executable Image)
File Traits
- No Version Info
- packed
- x64
Block Information
Block Information
During analysis, EnigmaSoft breaks file samples into logical blocks for classification and comparison with other samples. Blocks can be used to generate malware detection rules and to group file samples into families based on shared source code, functionality and other distinguishing attributes and characteristics. This section lists a summary of this block data, as well as its classification by EnigmaSoft. A visual representation of the block data is also displayed, where available.| Total Blocks: | 1,611 |
|---|---|
| Potentially Malicious Blocks: | 410 |
| Whitelisted Blocks: | 56 |
| Unknown Blocks: | 1,145 |
Visual Map
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
1
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
1
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
0
1
?
?
1
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
0
0
x
x
?
x
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
x
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
1
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
1
x
?
0
?
1
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
x
0
?
x
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
x
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
x
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
1
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
x
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
x
x
?
x
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
x
x
x
?
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
x
x
x
x
?
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
x
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
x
?
?
x
?
x
x
x
?
?
x
?
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
x
x
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
x
?
x
x
?
x
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
x
?
x
x
x
?
x
?
?
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
x
?
?
x
x
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
x
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
x
?
x
?
x
?
x
x
?
?
x
?
?
x
x
x
?
x
x
x
x
?
?
?
?
x
?
x
?
x
x
?
x
x
?
?
x
?
x
x
?
?
x
x
?
?
x
x
?
x
x
x
x
?
?
x
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
x
?
x
x
?
?
?
?
x
?
x
x
?
x
?
x
x
?
x
x
x
?
?
x
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
x
?
x
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
x
?
x
x
x
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
x
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
x
?
x
?
?
?
x
?
?
x
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
x
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
?
x
x
x
?
x
?
x
?
x
x
?
x
x
x
?
?
x
x
?
x
x
?
x
?
?
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
x
?
x
?
?
x
x
x
?
?
x
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
x
?
x
?
x
x
x
?
?
x
x
x
x
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
x
?
x
?
?
?
x
?
x
?
x
x
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
x
x
x
?
x
?
?
?
x
?
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
?
?
x
x
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
x
x
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
x
x
x
x
?
x
x
x
?
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
?
?
?
?
x
?
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
x
x
?
?
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
x
x
x
x
x
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
x
?
x
x
?
?
x
x
?
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
x
?
?
x
?
x
?
x
x
x
x
x
?
x
?
x
x
?
?
x
x
x
?
x
x
x
x
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
x
x
x
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
x
?
x
?
x
x
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
?
x
x
x
?
?
x
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
x
x
x
x
x
x
?
x
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
x
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
x
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
x
x
?
x
?
x
?
x
x
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
x
?
x
x
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
x
x
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
x
?
x
x
?
x
?
?
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
x
?
0 - Probable Safe Block
? - Unknown Block
x - Potentially Malicious Block
? - Unknown Block
x - Potentially Malicious Block
Windows API Usage
Windows API Usage
This section lists Windows API calls that are used by the samples in this family. Windows API usage analysis is a valuable tool that can help identify malicious activity, such as keylogging, security privilege escalation, data encryption, data exfiltration, interference with antivirus software, and network request manipulation.| Category | API |
|---|---|
| Syscall Use |
|
