PUP.Crack.BTA
Threat Scorecard
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecard
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards are assessment reports for different malware threats which have been collected and analyzed by our research team. EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards evaluate and rank threats using several metrics including real-world and potential risk factors, trends, frequency, prevalence, and persistence. EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards are updated regularly based on our research data and metrics and are useful for a wide range of computer users, from end users seeking solutions to remove malware from their systems to security experts analyzing threats.
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards display a variety of useful information, including:
Popularity Rank: The ranking of a particular threat in EnigmaSoft’s Threat Database.
Severity Level: The determined severity level of an object, represented numerically, based on our risk modeling process and research, as explained in our Threat Assessment Criteria.
Infected Computers: The number of confirmed and suspected cases of a particular threat detected on infected computers as reported by SpyHunter.
See also Threat Assessment Criteria.
| Threat Level: | 10 % (Normal) |
| Infected Computers: | 5 |
| First Seen: | October 3, 2026 |
| Last Seen: | October 17, 2026 |
| OS(es) Affected: | Windows |
PUP.Crack.BTA is a detection name used to identify a Potentially Unwanted Program (PUP) that masquerades as a software activation tool or "crack" patcher for Windows systems. In this particular case, the file presents itself under the file description "Topaz Labs runtime patcher," suggesting it is designed to appear as a legitimate patching utility for licensed software, even though it is flagged as unwanted. While its assigned danger level is low, users who encounter this detection should still take it seriously, as it falls into a broader category of software known for unwanted and sometimes risky behavior.
Table of Contents
What PUP.Crack.BTA Does
Like other programs in the Crack.BTA family, this detection is associated with software cracking or patching tools that attempt to bypass licensing restrictions on commercial applications. The sample identified under this detection is a 64-bit native Windows executable with a graphical user interface. It is not digitally signed, meaning there is no verified publisher information attached to confirm its legitimacy or origin.
Technical analysis shows the file interacts with process memory through functions such as WriteProcessMemory, and it uses low-level system calls including those for writing files, freeing virtual memory, setting memory information, and tracing. It also uses an anti-debugging technique (OutputDebugString), a method sometimes employed by software to detect or hinder analysis by security researchers. The file is not packed, meaning its code is not compressed or obfuscated in the way many malware samples are, but the combination of crack-style branding and process memory manipulation is a pattern commonly seen in PUPs and unwanted patchers that may alter the behavior of other installed software.
As is typical for this category of threat, programs like PUP.Crack.BTA may also exhibit broader unwanted behaviors, such as installing additional browser toolbars, displaying unwanted advertisements, or changing a browser's default home page without clear user consent.
How It Typically Gets Onto Computers
Crack and patch tools like this one are typically downloaded by users seeking to bypass payment or licensing for commercial software. These files are commonly distributed through unofficial download sites, torrent networks, and file-sharing forums. It is also typical for PUPs to be bundled with other free software installers, meaning a user may unknowingly install this program alongside something else they intentionally downloaded, often because bundled offers are pre-selected during installation.
Risks for the User
While its danger level is rated low, using crack or patch tools carries inherent risks. Such tools often require disabling security software to run, which can leave a system more exposed. Because the program is unsigned and lacks verifiable origin, users have no reliable way to confirm what it actually does beyond its stated purpose. Typical risks associated with this category include unwanted advertising, browser setting changes, degraded system performance, and exposure to further unwanted or harmful software bundled alongside it.
Signs of Infection
Users may notice unexpected changes to their browser, such as a new homepage, unfamiliar toolbars, or an increase in pop-up advertisements. A security tool flagging a downloaded "patcher" or "crack" file is also a clear sign. Unexplained new processes running in the background or software behaving differently after installing a cracked program can also indicate the presence of this type of PUP.
How to Stay Protected
Avoid downloading software cracks, keygens, or patchers, as these are a frequent source of PUPs and other unwanted programs. Only download software from official vendors or trusted sources, and pay close attention during installation to decline any bundled extra offers. Keeping security software updated and performing regular system scans can help detect and remove unwanted programs like PUP.Crack.BTA before they cause further issues.
Analysis Report
General information
| Family Name: | PUP.Crack.BTA |
|---|---|
| Signature status: | No Signature |
Known Samples
Known Samples
This section lists other file samples believed to be associated with this family.|
MD5:
0074ca6f619ae8bed3cc3f1a2eaac995
SHA1:
176e4f56fbc3d7c775c16d7097bc442a23ee81ad
SHA256:
9876961CB7447EBADCF39DE4217C70475DFCF3E41C1060E672005F1FC003FD21
File Size:
41.98 KB, 41984 bytes
|
Windows Portable Executable Attributes
- File doesn't have "Rich" header
- File doesn't have debug information
- File doesn't have security information
- File has exports table
- File is 64-bit executable
- File is either console or GUI application
- File is GUI application (IMAGE_SUBSYSTEM_WINDOWS_GUI)
- File is Native application (NOT .NET application)
- File is not packed
- IMAGE_FILE_DLL is not set inside PE header (Executable)
Show More
- IMAGE_FILE_EXECUTABLE_IMAGE is set inside PE header (Executable Image)
Windows PE Version Information
Windows PE Version Information
This section displays values and attributes that have been set in the Windows file version information data structure for samples within this family. To mislead users, malware actors often add fake version information mimicking legitimate software.| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| File Description | Topaz Labs runtime patcher |
| File Version | 1.0.0.4 |
| Legal Copyright | Copyright (C) 2026 |
| Product Version | 1.0.0.4 |
File Traits
- dll
- WriteProcessMemory
- x64
Block Information
Block Information
During analysis, EnigmaSoft breaks file samples into logical blocks for classification and comparison with other samples. Blocks can be used to generate malware detection rules and to group file samples into families based on shared source code, functionality and other distinguishing attributes and characteristics. This section lists a summary of this block data, as well as its classification by EnigmaSoft. A visual representation of the block data is also displayed, where available.| Total Blocks: | 66 |
|---|---|
| Potentially Malicious Blocks: | 52 |
| Whitelisted Blocks: | 14 |
| Unknown Blocks: | 0 |
Visual Map
? - Unknown Block
x - Potentially Malicious Block
Similar Families
Similar Families
This section lists other families that share similarities with this family, based on EnigmaSoft’s analysis. Many malware families are created from the same malware toolkits and use the same packing and encryption techniques but uniquely extend functionality. Similar families may also share source code, attributes, icons, subcomponents, compromised and/or invalid digital signatures, and network characteristics. Researchers leverage these similarities to rapidly and effectively triage file samples and extend malware detection rules.- Crack.BTA
Windows API Usage
Windows API Usage
This section lists Windows API calls that are used by the samples in this family. Windows API usage analysis is a valuable tool that can help identify malicious activity, such as keylogging, security privilege escalation, data encryption, data exfiltration, interference with antivirus software, and network request manipulation.| Category | API |
|---|---|
| Syscall Use |
Show More
|
| Anti Debug |
|
